Table of Contents
A newly proposed initiative within collegiate athletics is set to revolutionize the approach toward cannabis use among student-athletes. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) is set to vote on a significant proposal in June. This proposal aims to eliminate cannabis from the list of banned substances, especially for NCAA championship competitions. This forward-thinking move is part of a larger strategy designed to shift the focus from punishment to minimizing harm for student-athletes.
The underlying philosophy of this proposal is in line with the contemporary views on substance use in sports. Proponents of this change argue that the primary goal of substance regulations in sports should be to minimize harm rather than imposing stringent penalties on student-athletes. This perspective is seen as a more empathetic and effective approach to addressing substance use in college sports.
Building upon the changes implemented in 2022, which saw an increase in the allowable threshold for THC (the primary psychoactive compound in cannabis) among college athletes, this proposal seeks to further align the NCAA’s substance policies with those of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). The 2022 amendment was a significant step toward modernizing the NCAA’s stance on cannabis, and the current proposal seeks to continue this trajectory.
The rationale behind this latest proposal is to reclassify cannabis like how alcohol is treated within the NCAA framework. It is important to note that this change is not intended to encourage or endorse the use of cannabis among student-athletes. Rather, the substance is not perceived to confer any unfair competitive advantage in sports. This viewpoint is critical in understanding the shift in policy, as it recognizes the distinction between performance-enhancing substances and substances like cannabis, which do not have a direct impact on athletic performance.
Pat Chun, the athletics director at Washington State University and chair of the Strategic Vision and Planning Committee, eloquently articulated this perspective in a recent statement. “Cannabis is not a performance-enhancing substance, and we determined that the substance testing conducted at NCAA championships should focus on substances that impact competitive outcomes,” Chun stated. He further clarified, “To be clear, this does not mean that NCAA members condone or promote the use of cannabinoids. However, rather than focus on testing and subsequently penalizing student-athletes who use cannabis, NCAA efforts should focus on a harm reduction strategy, similar to substances like alcohol.”
This proposed change represents a significant shift in the NCAA’s approach to substance use in sports, signaling a move towards more progressive and empathetic policies. It reflects a growing recognition of the need to balance the health and well-being of student-athletes with the integrity of competitive sports.
Reforming NCAA Substance Policy: A Shift Towards Education and Support over Penalties
Should the proposed policy change be adopted, it would come into effect at the commencement of the new academic year in August. This amendment is designed to have a retroactive application, meaning it would extend “to any penalty associated with a previous positive test,” as articulated in a recent announcement by the governing body. This retrospective application is significant as it acknowledges the evolving perspective on the substance in question and aims to rectify past actions that were taken under a different regulatory framework.
The proposal for this policy change was formally introduced last week by the Division I Council of the NCAA, a key governing body within the association. There is an anticipated vote scheduled in June to formally adopt this change for Division I schools. However, the director of sports medicine at the NCAA’s Sports Science Institute has indicated that the process of passing similar legislation for Divisions II and III may require a longer timeframe.
This initiative follows a preliminary recommendation made in June of the previous year by the NCAA’s Committee on Competitive Safeguards and Medical Aspects of Sports (CSMAS). The recommendation advised that each of the organization’s three governing bodies should consider removing the substance in question from the list of banned substances. This recommendation was a significant step in reevaluating the approach toward this substance within the athletic community.
During a recent cannabinoid policy panel at an NCAA meeting in Phoenix, members of the CSMAS committee expressed that the focus of testing should shift from disqualifying athletes for positive tests to identifying and addressing problematic substance use among individual athletes. This approach represents a paradigm shift in how substance use is managed in the context of collegiate athletics, emphasizing support and rehabilitation over punitive measures.
Nadine Mastroleo, a member of CSMAS and a psychology professor at New York’s Binghamton University, underscored this sentiment. As reported by Cronkite News, Mastroleo highlighted the efficacy of treatment and education strategies over penalties, especially among college students. She emphasized the importance of localized testing within campuses as a more effective method for identifying individuals who might be struggling and in need of support.
Historically, college athletes have faced stringent testing during postseason play, with positive tests potentially resulting in a loss of an entire season’s eligibility. The proposed changes signal a shift in focus from penalizing players for isolated incidents to addressing more serious, problematic use.
Deena Casiero, another CSMAS member and the head team physician at the University of Connecticut added to this discussion by advocating for harm-reduction interventions. Casiero stressed the importance of meeting individuals where they are, suggesting that such approaches are more effective in reducing health consequences related to cannabis use than abstinence-only strategies. She also noted that random testing at championships is less likely to serve as an effective deterrent compared to educating athletes about the substance’s effects on their bodies. This perspective highlights a growing recognition of the need for a more nuanced and informed approach to substance use in collegiate sports.
Shifting Attitudes in Sports: Major Leagues Reassess Policies on Substance Use
In a formal declaration last September, the NCAA committee presented a compelling recommendation to end the ban on a certain substance. This recommendation was not made lightly but rather stemmed from a recognition of the ineffectiveness of the existing policy, which involved banning testing, and penalizing athletes. The committee affirmed its stance that this substance is not performance-enhancing and stressed the critical importance of transitioning towards a harm-reduction strategy. This approach signifies a progressive shift in understanding and managing substance use in sports, aligning more with contemporary societal views and scientific insights.
The committee elaborated that the timing for discussing and adopting potential legislation would be independently determined by the governance structures of each of the three NCAA divisions. This recommendation was the culmination of an extensive study, drawing upon knowledge and expertise from a diverse array of sources, including medical doctors, substance misuse experts, and membership practitioners. This comprehensive research underscores the depth and thoroughness with which the committee approached this sensitive issue.
This movement within the NCAA reflects a broader trend observed across various sports organizations, which are reevaluating their policies on this substance in light of changing state laws and societal attitudes. Several major sports leagues and organizations have recently amended their testing policies for athletes concerning this substance.
For instance, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) took a significant step last month by formally removing this substance from its list of banned substances. This decision was built upon an earlier reform that had already limited penalties related to THC.
In a landmark move, the National Basketball Association (NBA) and its players union reached a consensus in June of the previous year. They signed a collective bargaining agreement that not only removed this substance from the league’s list of banned substances but also established guidelines permitting players to invest in and endorse cannabis brands under certain conditions.
Similarly, Nevada sports regulators made a decisive move last year, voting to propose a regulatory amendment to the governor. This amendment aimed to shield athletes from penalties related to the use or possession of this substance provided they complied with state law.
The National Football League (NFL) witnessed a notable change in its substance testing policy in 2020 as a result of a collective bargaining agreement. This change was indicative of a significant shift in the league’s approach to substance use.
Further emphasizing this trend, the NFL and its players union announced last June their plan to jointly fund independent research. This research is focused on exploring the therapeutic benefits of CBD as an alternative pain treatment, particularly for players suffering from concussions. This initiative highlights the growing interest in alternative treatments within professional sports.
The New York Media Softball League (NYMSL), which includes teams from prestigious media houses like The Wall Street Journal, High Times, and BuzzFeed, also announced a notable partnership last July. The league entered into a sponsorship deal with a Kentucky-based CBD company, illustrating the increasing acceptance and integration of such substances in various sectors.
This collaborative effort was partly inspired by similar initiatives undertaken by Major League Baseball (MLB) and teams like the Kansas City Royals and Chicago Cubs. These teams had recently formed partnerships with CBD businesses, signaling a broader acceptance and exploration of the potential benefits of CBD in the sporting world.
Major Leagues and CBD: Embracing Change and Challenging Policies in Professional Sports
Major League Baseball (MLB) made a significant stride in 2022 by announcing a league-wide partnership with a leading hemp-derived CBD brand, Charlotte’s Web Holdings. This partnership, which named Charlotte’s Web as the “Official CBD of MLB,” marked a notable moment in sports history, reflecting a broader acceptance and integration of CBD products in professional sports. The deal with one of the most recognizable CBD companies in the country underscores the growing trend of major sports leagues embracing alternative wellness and recovery options.
Despite the welcoming of these changes by many advocates, there has been a notable level of criticism directed towards the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA) for its continued ban on cannabis. A panel within the agency, in an opinion piece published in August, argued that the use of cannabis by athletes contravenes the “spirit of sport.” They posited that athletes, seen as role models, should not engage in activities that could potentially impair them and pose risks to others, thereby undermining their status as exemplars in society.
This stance by WADA has been challenged, particularly in light of high-profile cases involving athletes and cannabis-related infractions. Advocates have been vociferous in their calls for reform, especially following the suspension of U.S. sprinter Sha’Carri Richardson from Olympic events due to a positive THC test in 2021. This incident sparked widespread debate over the fairness and relevance of such bans in modern sports.
In the wake of Richardson’s suspension, the U.S. Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) took a stand, asserting that the international rules governing cannabis use among athletes “must change.” This sentiment was echoed by the White House and President Joe Biden, who signaled a readiness for new policies. This shift in perspective was further reinforced by congressional lawmakers who amplified the call for reform.
Another significant incident that highlighted the complexity of international cannabis laws involved WNBA star Brittney Griner. In 2022, Griner was described as “wrongfully detained” in Russia by the Biden White House after she pleaded guilty to unlawfully possessing cannabis vape cartridges. This high-profile case brought further attention to the global discrepancies in cannabis regulations and their impact on individuals.
also within broader legislative frameworks. The intersection of sports, law, and public opinion on this issue is becoming increasingly prominent, suggesting that major institutional changes could be on the horizon.
The evolving dialogue around this topic highlights a shift in societal attitudes and a reconsideration of long-held stances on substance use, especially in high-profile arenas like professional sports. The involvement of prominent figures and institutions in this debate has the potential to catalyze significant policy shifts, both within sports organizations and in governmental legislation.
Furthermore, the cases involving high-profile athletes serve as catalysts in the discourse surrounding cannabis and its place in the realm of professional sports. These incidents not only question the efficacy and relevance of existing policies but also challenge the societal norms and perceptions surrounding cannabis use.
The dialogue surrounding this issue has transcended the boundaries of sports and entered into a larger conversation about health, wellness, and personal freedom. As more sports leagues and organizations begin to reevaluate their stance, it is likely that this trend will continue to gain momentum, potentially influencing policy changes in other sectors as well.
The narrative around cannabis use in sports is increasingly focusing on the potential therapeutic benefits and the need for policies that reflect current scientific understanding and social attitudes. This approach contrasts sharply with the historical view of cannabis as a purely recreational or problematic substance.
In conclusion, the ongoing debate around cannabis use in sports, exemplified by the actions of MLB and the controversies within WADA, reflects a broader societal shift towards a more nuanced and empathetic understanding of cannabis. This shift is likely to continue influencing policy decisions in sports and beyond, as stakeholders seek to align regulations with contemporary values, scientific research, and public opinion.
